![]() So, they really will be kind of a meaningful deterrent. Senior US defence officials said cost-effectiveness was not the reason Australia chose the earlier Virginia-class submarines, but more so compatibility with existing defence assets.ĭr Karlin said the first submarines would still be special for the Australians without the VPM, “because of their stealth, their range and their endurance. Members on both sides of US Congress have firmly backed the plan to sell Virginia-class submarines and receive major Australian investment to lift ailing submarine production. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said on Monday that the country would spend up to $368 billion over the next three decades to buy a fleet of eight nuclear-powered submarines. ![]() The module provides more than three times the firepower of the earlier Virginia-class submarines for about 15 per cent increase in the cost of each submarine. The VPM is an 84-foot (25.6 metre) section of the boat that serves as an undersea vertical launcher for missiles. “I think all three countries saw that that didn’t make sense.” “Virginia payload module (VPM) will not be a part of it,” she said. Virginia-class submarines under construction at Huntington Ingalls Industries’ shipbuilding facility in Newport, Virginia. ![]() US Deputy Under-Secretary of Defence for Policy, Mara Karlin, said on Tuesday (Wednesday AEDT) that the first three submarines to be purchased by Australia would not be the latest models. Washington| Australia’s first Virginia-class submarines will be earlier versions that do not include special payload modules that fire ballistic missiles, helping reduce the cost of its first nuclear submarines by about 15 per cent, but also making them less lethal. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |